Gulf Turbine ServicesExec◂ Apps

Limestone U1 — Steam Turbine Major

GTS-2022-016CLOSED 12/14/2022
Edit
Added Jul 8, 2026Completed May 26, 2022
Company
Gulf Turbine Services
Client
Riverbend Energy
Source
MANUAL
Contract Type
LUMP SUM
Market Segment
STEAM_OVERHAUL
Public/Private
PRIVATE
Project Manager
Ray Daniels
Estimator
Phil Carter
Superintendent
Marcus Hill
Location
Jewett, TX

Margin Analysis

Original Margin
11.0%
$451,000
Revised Margin
7.0%
$331,000
Final Margin
-0.9%
$-40,365
Margin Fade (Bid)
-11.9%
CO Impact
$-120,000
Margin Fade (Revised)
-7.9%

Where They Land

Final Margin-0.9%
Break Even
-0.9%+24.4%
Gain / Fade-7.9%
As Predicted
-7.9%+2.0%
This project
Other projects
Zero reference

Revenue & Cost Summary

StageRevenueCostProfitMargin
Original$4,100,000$3,649,000$451,00011.0%
Revised$4,700,000$4,369,000$331,0007.0%
Final$4,700,000$4,740,365$-40,365-0.9%

Cost Category Variance

CategoryOriginalRevisedFinalVariance $Over/Under %
Labor$1,269,301$1,532,013$1,746,495+$214,482+14.0%
Material$1,096,585$1,115,214$1,137,518+$22,304+2.0%
Subcontractor$1,063,136$1,095,448$1,112,080+$16,632+1.5%
Equipment$271,501$308,094$333,974+$25,880+8.4%
Other$109,470$318,232$410,298+$92,066+28.9%

Labor Productivity

Original Rate
$69/hr
Revised Rate
$79/hr
Final Rate
$59/hr
Hours Variance
11,206
Rate Variance $
$-296,006
Volume Variance $
$773,200

Lessons Learned

What hurt

Steam majors are our hardest fade — LP last-stage blades had more erosion than scoped, and we under-price steam labor.

Client feedback

Riverbend understood the erosion was unforeseeable but wants tighter scoping next time.

Assumptions / what to do differently

Steam needs a different (lower) productivity factor than GT in the estimate; don't reuse GT labor norms.

STEAMPRODUCTIVITY FACTORFADE